I guess I should have realized when
Google announced they were going to forbid porn on their Blogger subdivision
that they weren't serious. Not that it isn't a nice idea. But defining what
actually is porn was hard for the Supreme Court even before they got highly
polarized and politicized.
When I first heard Google's
announcement I was curious. Hello. Porn on a blog? Porn by whom? With Fifty
Shades of Gray burning up Kindle circuits for so long, isn't this a little like
closing the porn door after the wild animals have slipped their leashes and
escaped the whips?
Then I saw the actual Google
warning on the Blogger start page: "On March 23rd Blogger will no longer
allow certain sexually explicit content. Learn More Here." Sounds pretty
harsh doesn't it? Not so much.
"Um... excuse me, sometime later
this month you'll need to find someplace else to post your porn..."
So it was no surprise when the very
next day Google retracted their initiative. In a society where one person's
porn is another person's free speech, albeit it with pictures, it's hard to
clamp down on. Hard to tell people not to cross a line when you're not sure
where to draw it.
This is the world of selfies and snapchat
and totally unhacked public display of all manner of narcissistic nudity. These
days it's porn for the people, Google.
If folks want to expose themselves,
who are we to say they can't? Google's next idea, to have folks post a graphic
content warning landing page, is far better. That will at least give us the
option to avoid it.
There's a pretty clear line right
there. Think of it as the difference between porn by choice, and an unsolicited
tweet from Anthony Weiner.
America, ya gotta love it.
No comments:
Post a Comment