'Tis the season for raging opinions
on what's important for the holiday season. A time when most religions call for
extra tolerance and many of their followers become more intolerant.
So in some ways I should be
heartened by the fascination some folks have with the Kardashians. It keeps
them out of trouble, I suppose. To follow with near-religious zeal the staged
and sordid lives of manufactured celebrities whose only contribution to society
is their own narcissism is its own reward, and/or punishment.
Not in the category of ascetics who
used to flog themselves with barbed whips while they wore hair shirts, but
certainly the psychological equivalent.
And narcissism is definitely the
new religion, with selfies galore littering the interweb and tweets and
Instagram and Facebook pictures causing hackable clumps in the cloud to rain
destruction on all and sundry.
So it wasn't much of a surprise
that Kim Kardashian's recent hope to "break the internet" with her
nude photoshoot in Paper magazine generated so much digital proliferation. On
the “hope for humanity” side, it was positive that more people posted on
Twitter about the Philae probe landing on a comet with 479,434 tweets. What wasn't
too hopeful was that in the same 24-hour period KK's naked protruding posterior
got 307,782 tweets.
So basically, that's only 172,000
more people that had some sense of perspective.
Still, if 35% more total tweeters see a robotic mission that lasted ten
years and took an incredible amount of planning, execution and precision as
being more important than a naked set of buttocks there's hope for this world
yet.
Then again, there's something a
little odd, and a little scary, about posting pictures of people's posteriors.
Might be fine on Twitter.
Butt on Facebook?
America, ya gotta love it.
No comments:
Post a Comment