My friend Bobby tweeted an
interesting observation the other day. It was that we once wrote our most
personal thoughts in a diary and got upset if anyone read them. Now we post
them online and get upset when people don't read them.
Through all the irony shines a
tarnished truth. Public self confession is a human need. I would also argue the
lack of privacy that folks allow themselves by posting this and tweeting that
and instagramming the other is not only a function of the desire for social
togetherness but also the flaring up of the spark of creativity that makes us
human.
Rembrandt, great 17th century Dutch
Master, was most known for his amazing self-portraits. Which, if you think
about it, were nothing more than selfies.
Sure, he had to actually work hard
to make them. And his version of Snapchat was to get out the turpentine,
commence rubbing, and start over. But it's the same thing in concept.
Or take Proust's
Remembrance of
Things Past. Wasn't it a form of the constant and annoying Facebook
postings we get from our over the top "friends" today? Lovely,
lovely, I'm glad you woke up and brushed your teeth.
Let me just say. I tried to read
Remembrance
of Things Past. Four words: Early 20th Century TMI.
I think a case can be made that
most novels are semi-autobiographical. So they partake of the same impetus as
well. But again, they require more work.
That, I think, is the main
distinction between the spark of creativity then and now. Unfortunately, what
the social media revolution has foisted upon is for the most part lazy dreck.
Unedited, unreadable, uninspired, and unmistakably and unarguably universal.
And ordinary.
Rembrandt and Proust were artists.
Social media is a reality show.
America, ya gotta love it.
No comments:
Post a Comment