I was reading how some football
player was suspended for using a banned substance. The article mentioned that
it was suspected that the banned substance was in fact marijuana.
And it got me wondering, isn't that
a bit of a legal dilemma when it comes to Colorado and Washington state, where
the substance is not only not banned for medical use, it's not banned for
recreational use either?
What's a citizen to do? I fully
understand banning its use, even in off hours, by certain workers in certain
professions, doctors and emergency utility linemen come to mind. But a football
lineman?
In what way is he going to hurt
anyone because he's a little numb? I would think numbing the pain would be
right up there on the medicinal end of things anyhow. Is it any worse than
being addicted to oxycontin?
And hey, you're saving the league
money. Why not self medicate? Even if you're self medicating a pulled groin?
That whole medicinal versus recreational
distinction is weird anyhow. You get high either way. Medicinal? The best buzz
I ever inadvertently had was when I went it to have my colonoscopy. Wow. They
ought to make
that stuff illegal.
If it wasn't for the prepping
regimen I had to go through the day before I'd definitely consider volunteering
for another one on fairly regular basis.
"You sure you didn't see
anything Doc? Those polyps can be pretty tricky, better put me under again. I
don't have to work, or fix a power line, or even play in a football game till
next week. Put the IV right there and take a really long close look..."
I can see the headlines now.
Washington State; pioneer, trendsetter, and leading light for the first ever
recreational colonoscopy.
America, ya gotta love it.
No comments:
Post a Comment