The recent election brought up some
interesting things, not least that a potential run-off was possible between two
candidates with less than a hundred vote difference between them.
What was especially odd was that
the office they were running for was county auditor, which counts the votes,
and that they were both election officials, and that one of them was currently
the election official in charge of the vote count.
It really showed how crucial each
vote is. Which led me to another observation. In looking at the results for the
candidates, I noticed that if a candidate ran unopposed, they often got fewer
votes. A contested race would get 32,000 votes for example, while an uncontested
candidate would only garner 29,000. How did this happen?
There's only one thing to surmise,
some people weren't voting for everything or everyone on their ballot. Some
people weren't filling in every bubble. They were Lazy Bubble
Non-filler-outers.
Oh, the shame.
I polled my workmates, who got a
bit uncomfortable at that point. A word of caution; if, in fact, you poll your
workmates, be gentle.
They admitted to being less than
conscientious about filling in every bubble, figuring that the uncontested guy
was going to win anyhow, so why waste the effort. I understand, but for me it's
an OCD challenge to fill in every oval perfectly and not color outside the
lines. What was all that coloring book training in my youth for?
Here's the sad thing. If you don't
vote for the uncontested person, a write-in candidate could emerge the
victor.
So be warned -- don't be a lazy
bubble non-filler-outer. If our next City Councilperson is Donald Duck it'll be
your fault.
On second thought, maybe a
loud-mouthed character that doesn't wear pants would be a refreshing change...
America, ya gotta love it.